TELIP: Strategic Telecom Advisory Engagement

Abstract

This TELIP proposes two actions for Platform and Treasury Council approval:

  1. Strategic Telecom Advisory Engagement. A dedicated TEL Treasury allocation with an initial transfer of 50,000,000 TEL for the first quarter, with subsequent quarterly transfers authorized by the TAO prior to the end of each quarter for the duration of the engagement, to fund a strategic telecom advisory engagement designed to accelerate GSMA mobile network operator ecosystem development on Telcoin Network. The engagement retains a senior telecom industry executive with over 25 years of experience in telecommunications innovation, direct GSMA ecosystem access, and a demonstrated track record in blockchain product development within the global mobile operator ecosystem. Compensation is structured as a monthly advisory fee of $10,000 USD plus two performance-based milestone bonuses of $25,000 USD each, for a total maximum annual cost of $170,000 USD. The engagement runs for an initial 24-month term with a 3-month evaluation period. The advisor’s identity is disclosed to all Council members under the confidentiality obligations set forth in Article 32 of the Telcoin Association Constitution and will be publicly announced at month four following an initial content and evaluation phase.

  2. STORM Partners Service Amendment. Approval of a revised scope and fee structure for STORM Partners’ ongoing engagement with the TAO, effective 1 April 2026. The amendment restructures STORM’s role from full-service strategic marketing (CHF 160,000/year) to a focused engagement covering community and ecosystem management plus growth and business development support (CHF 120,000/year), and formally adds program coordination for the strategic telecom advisory engagement within that revised scope.


Motivation

Telcoin Network is purpose-built for one constituency: GSMA mobile network operators. Its validator architecture reserves participation rights exclusively for GSMA Operator Members. Its governance structure is designed around MNO engagement. Its economic model depends on operators not only validating the chain but building services on top of it - financial applications, mobile money infrastructure, and subscriber-facing products that generate the transaction volume that sustains the network. Validator participation and application development are not sequential phases. They are twin pillars of the same objective, and both are essential to the network’s long-term economic viability.

Commercial momentum is building. MNOs are in the pipeline. Mainnet is approaching. The commercial team has done the work required to get here, and the foundation is real. The question this TELIP addresses is not whether the Association can execute on MNO engagement - it clearly can - but whether there is a ceiling on what that engagement can achieve without a specific kind of voice the Association does not currently have.

That ceiling is the GSMA itself.

Telcoin Network’s ambition is not merely to onboard individual operators. It is to establish Telcoin Network as the blockchain standard for the telecommunications industry - the unified ledger on which MNOs validate transactions, build financial services, and replatform mobile money infrastructure that today runs on fragmented, proprietary rails. Achieving that outcome requires more than bilateral BD conversations. It requires GSMA-level alignment: working groups, standardization initiatives, and the kind of institutional credibility that shapes how the entire industry evaluates new infrastructure.

That process cannot be driven from outside the GSMA. Standards bodies respond to peers, not vendors. MNO product and strategy teams are influenced by operators they respect, not by projects pitching to them. The decision to commit validator infrastructure, allocate developer resources, and build on a new blockchain platform - at the level required for a genuine industry standard to emerge - is a decision that moves when a trusted, senior voice from within the operator world says it should move.

What the Association needs at this stage is a champion from within: a mobile operator veteran with deep expertise in both telecommunications and blockchain technology and their convergence, with active GSMA relationships, and with the standing to align peers around a shared infrastructure standard. Someone who is not representing Telcoin to the industry but bringing the industry into alignment with what Telcoin Network represents. This TELIP funds that capability.

Why a Separate Treasury Allocation

The Y3 TAO budget was designed around known engineering, audit, and operational costs for mainnet launch. This advisory engagement was not contemplated in that budget and represents a distinct strategic initiative with its own accountability framework, evaluation criteria, and milestone-based compensation structure. A separate allocation gives the Platform and Treasury Councils direct visibility into the cost and impact of this engagement, rather than absorbing it into TAO operational overhead where it would be harder to evaluate independently.


Advisor Profile

The advisor’s identity has been disclosed to all Platform Council, Treasury Council, and Compliance Council members under standard confidentiality provisions. Public identification will occur at month four of the engagement, following the initial evaluation and content development phase described below.

The following profile is provided for community context:

Industry Background: The advisor has spent over 25 years in telecommunications innovation and technology, working across broadband, 3G, 4G, FTTP, and IoT deployments. For the past decade, the advisor has focused on the application of blockchain technology to enterprise and telecom use cases.

Current Position: The advisor holds a senior leadership role within a major global operator’s blockchain and Web3 initiatives, working at the intersection of mobile connectivity, digital wallets, IoT, and enterprise blockchain infrastructure.

GSMA and Industry Access: The advisor is an active participant in GSMA-related initiatives, a regular speaker at Mobile World Congress and major blockchain industry events, and maintains direct working relationships with senior decision-makers across multiple MNOs.

Relevance to Telcoin Network: The advisor’s combination of telecom operator experience, blockchain product leadership, and GSMA ecosystem access positions the Association to open engagement channels with MNO product and strategy teams that are not currently accessible. As Telcoin Network moves from infrastructure buildout to ecosystem activation, this profile adds a capability that compounds the momentum already underway.


Part 1: Strategic Telecom Advisory Engagement

Engagement Structure

Parameter Detail
Engagement Type Independent contractor, strategic advisory
Term 24 months from effective date, with 3-month evaluation period
Advisory Fee $10,000 USD per month, payable in USD-pegged stablecoin
Milestone Bonus 1 $25,000 USD upon establishment of a GSMA Working Group with a formally defined Telcoin role, or formal Telcoin participation in an existing GSMA Working Group
Milestone Bonus 2 $25,000 USD upon execution of the first Telecom Design Partner LOI or pilot agreement tied to a Telcoin Network use case
Maximum Annual Cost $170,000 USD (12 months base + both milestones)
Maximum 24-Month Cost $290,000 USD (24 months base + both milestones)
Program Coordinator STORM Partners, under the amended engagement described in Part 2 of this TELIP
Payment Method Monthly in arrears, upon invoice submission, via stablecoin transfer

Evaluation Period

The initial three months constitute a mutual evaluation period. During this time, either party may elect to discontinue the engagement on 15 days’ written notice. If terminated during the evaluation period, only accrued payment obligations apply and unused TEL from the allocation returns to the Treasury.

Pre-Announcement Phase (Months 1-3)

The advisor’s role will not be publicly announced until month four. During months 1-3, the advisor’s contribution takes two forms:

Written Content: The advisor will publish one article per month covering Telcoin Network and the applications it can host. Topics will be drawn from the Association’s product and network capabilities, including the blockchain standard opportunity for the GSMA, the MNO validation model, and the telecom-blockchain application landscape. All articles are reviewed and approved by the TAO before publication.

This serves two purposes. First, it builds an authentic content foundation ahead of the public announcement, establishing the advisor’s independent thought leadership on topics directly relevant to Telcoin Network’s positioning. Second, it gives both parties a working period to establish mutual value before full public visibility.

Onboarding: Before any external engagement begins, the advisor will participate in a structured onboarding workshop covering Telcoin Network architecture, strategic positioning, MNO strategy, and GSMA engagement priorities. STORM Partners coordinates scheduling and prepares the briefing materials.

Scope of Services

Following the pre-announcement phase, the advisor’s scope includes:

Strategic Telecom Advisory. Guidance on positioning Telcoin Network as a development platform for telecom-native blockchain applications, including market dynamics, MNO product strategy considerations, revenue model design for operator-built applications, and broader industry positioning within the GSMA ecosystem.

GSMA Engagement. Support for the Association’s engagement with telecommunications stakeholders and the GSMA ecosystem, including participation in working groups, industry forums, and standardization initiatives that advance Telcoin Network’s position as the blockchain infrastructure for telecoms.

Strategic Introductions. Introductions to senior MNO product and strategy decision-makers, GSMA participants, and telecom ecosystem partners relevant to application development, pilot programs, and ecosystem growth.

Materials Review. Strategic input on telecom-facing materials, industry positioning documents, and written or verbal recommendations on engagement pathways with MNO product teams.

Ecosystem Development. Active contribution to the broader Telcoin Network application ecosystem, including engagement with developers building on Telcoin Network and the advisor’s own deployment of blockchain products on the network as a firsthand demonstration of platform capability.

Advisory Accountability Framework

The metrics that follow are a means to an end. That end deserves an explicit statement before any measurement framework is introduced.

This engagement exists to advance three outcomes for the Telcoin Association. They are not sequential. They are mutually constitutive, and all three must develop together for the engagement to fulfill its purpose.

MNO participation that drives network activity, not passive yield. Telcoin Network’s economic viability depends on operators treating it as an active revenue platform - building applications, distributing financial services through their subscriber bases, and generating the transaction volume that justifies and sustains the infrastructure. Validator participation and application development are twin pillars of the same objective. An operator running a validator node while contributing no network usage falls short of the model the Association is building toward. Every introductory conversation, working group session, and strategic relationship this engagement produces should be oriented toward operators who will participate in both dimensions.

A thriving application developer ecosystem built on Telcoin Network. Validators secure the chain. Developers determine what it becomes. Telcoin Network’s long-term position as telecommunications infrastructure depends on the breadth and quality of applications built on top of it - mobile money services, financial products, subscriber-facing applications that demonstrate what blockchain-native telecom infrastructure can do at scale. This engagement contributes to that ecosystem directly: the advisor will deploy their own blockchain products on Telcoin Network as a firsthand demonstration of platform capability, and will actively cultivate relationships with developers and operators exploring telecom-native use cases.

Establishment of Telcoin Network as the blockchain standard for the telecommunications industry. This is the defining objective, and it is the one that cannot be achieved through bilateral BD engagement alone. The telecommunications industry aligns on standards through the GSMA - through working groups, institutional participation, and the accumulated influence of trusted voices from within the operator community. This engagement is the Association’s investment in that process: placing a credible, senior, GSMA-embedded voice in the conversations where the next generation of telecommunications infrastructure is being defined, with the explicit goal of positioning Telcoin Network as the recognized standard for that infrastructure.

These three outcomes are what the metrics below are designed to track. Progress against them will be assessed qualitatively through regular Council reporting, with the understanding that the most consequential developments in standards adoption and ecosystem formation move on timelines that resist reduction to quarterly counts.

  1. Access and Room Quality

The primary test: Is the advisor getting the Telcoin Association into rooms it could not access on its own?

Metric Cadence
Meaningful telecom or GSMA meetings facilitated Quarterly log
GSMA Working Group sessions attended or contributed to on the Association’s behalf Quarterly log
GSMA Working Group status progression (Observer, Contributor, Defined Role) 6-month review
Closed-door MWC or equivalent sessions where Telcoin had a seat Per-event count

Target: 3-5 meaningful, decision-maker-level engagements per quarter. General conference attendance does not count.

  1. Strategic Introductions
Metric Cadence
Qualified operator introductions (Director level or above) Quarterly log
Introductions scoped to application development, validation, settlement, or pilot use cases Noted per intro
Intro-to-meeting conversion rate Tracked per quarter
Operator conversations progressed to Telcoin Network technical briefing Quarterly

Target: 2-3 high-quality introductions per quarter. Emphasis on Director-level or above at relevant MNOs and GSMA stakeholders.

  1. Strategy Input
Metric Cadence
Written strategic input delivered Quarterly
MNO and GSMA-facing document reviews with written feedback As needed, logged
Advisory inputs that influenced Association telecom-facing product narrative or roadmap Logged by TAO per review period

Target: One substantive written strategy input per quarter. Document reviews as requested with written response.

  1. Adoption Progress
Metric Cadence
GSMA Working Group formal establishment or defined Telcoin role Milestone trigger ($25,000)
First Telecom Design Partner LOI or pilot tied to a Telcoin Network application use case Milestone trigger ($25,000)
Advisor’s own blockchain products launched on Telcoin Network Logged by TAO
Active engagement with application developers building on Telcoin Network Quarterly log
At least one credible adoption pathway actively progressing Quarterly review
  1. Reporting Cadence
Activity Cadence
Quarterly summary report (1-2 pages) covering access, introductions, strategy input, adoption status Quarterly
Attendance at global Council meeting Quarterly
3-month continuation review End of month 3
Mutual 6-month engagement review Month 6 and month 18

STORM Partners coordinates reporting, translating advisory inputs into council-ready formats. The advisor reviews and confirms each quarterly summary before Council submission. The TAO owns the submission of advisory performance reporting to Council.

Part 2: STORM Partners Service Amendment

Background

STORM Partners has served as the Telcoin Association’s strategic marketing and communications partner since July 2025, under a Letter of Engagement (LoE) with Telcoin Autonomous Ops Ltd. The original engagement covered strategic brand positioning, integrated campaign execution, community and ecosystem engagement, creative asset production, content strategy, and reporting and analytics at an annual fee of CHF 160,000.

The Y3 TEL Allocation Proposal approved $130,000 for the STORM Partnership as a line item within the TAO’s 2026 operational budget.

As the Association’s priorities have shifted toward mainnet launch and MNO ecosystem development, the scope of STORM’s engagement has evolved. This section seeks Council approval for a formal amendment to STORM’s services that aligns their role with the Association’s current operational needs.

Revised Scope of Services

Effective 1 April 2026, STORM’s engagement is restructured into two defined service areas:

A. Community and Ecosystem Engagement (CHF 4,500/month)

This covers the day-to-day operational layer that keeps the Telcoin community informed and aligned:

  • Discord moderation and ecosystem coordination
  • Community communications and updates (including weekly ICYMI summaries and announcements)
  • Council-related communication coordination and meeting support
  • Monthly community sentiment tracking

The target is continuity: no disruption in communication cadence, clear and consistent messaging across channels, and a stable or positive community sentiment trend.

B. Growth, Business Development Support and Strategic Telecom Advisory Program Coordination (CHF 5,500/month)

This covers structured, measurable support for the Association’s partnership development led by STORM managing Partner Sheraz Ahmed:

  • Strategic partnership coordination
  • Ecosystem introductions and opportunity mapping
  • Support for priority counterparties and ecosystem initiatives
  • Strategic advisory and coordination

At the start of each quarter, STORM and the TAO will jointly define a priority target list. Monthly tracking covers qualified introductions surfaced, intro-to-meeting conversion, and opportunities progressed. The target is 2-4 meaningful opportunities progressed per month, with emphasis on quality over volume.

In addition to the above, STORM serves as the administrative program coordinator for the strategic telecom advisory engagement described in Part 1 of this TELIP. Coordination duties include:

  • Managing communications between the TAO and the advisor
  • Maintaining engagement records and metric tracking
  • Coordinating onboarding workshops and briefing material preparation
  • Translating the advisor’s inputs into council-ready reporting formats
  • Coordinating the advisor’s quarterly summary report before Council submission

This coordination function is included within STORM’s revised monthly retainer and does not represent additional cost to the Association.

Revised Fee Structure

Component Monthly Fee
Community and Ecosystem Engagement CHF 4,500
Growth and Business Development Support CHF 5,500
Total Monthly Retainer CHF 10,000
Annual Cost CHF 120,000

This represents a CHF 40,000 annual reduction from the original LoE (CHF 160,000 to CHF 120,000), reflecting the narrowed scope.

Q1 2026 Settlement

In recognition of scope adjustments during Q1 2026, STORM has issued a credit of CHF 15,000 to the Association. This credit is applied over three months:

Month Fee Credit Applied Net Payable
April 2026 CHF 10,000 CHF 5,000 CHF 5,000
May 2026 CHF 10,000 CHF 5,000 CHF 5,000
June 2026 CHF 10,000 CHF 5,000 CHF 5,000
July 2026 onwards CHF 10,000 - CHF 10,000

The credit is applied against future invoices only and does not constitute a refund or cash payment.

STORM Accountability Framework

STORM has developed an operational accountability framework governing the delivery of services. The framework provides structure, visibility, and alignment on activities and reporting cadence. It is designed around three principles: quality over quantity, signal over noise, and shared accountability.

Reporting Cadence:

  • Bi-weekly check-in (30 minutes) covering community status, BD pipeline progress, key initiatives, and next priorities
  • Monthly one-page summary covering community overview, BD pipeline summary, strategic contributions, and forward-looking priorities

Performance Assessment:

Performance is assessed on a qualitative and holistic basis, taking into account the strategic and advisory nature of the engagement. Assessment criteria include: quality and relevance of strategic input, effectiveness of community and ecosystem engagement, contribution to business development pipeline progression, and alignment with the Association’s evolving priorities.

Metrics and targets referenced within the accountability framework are directional and do not constitute binding performance obligations or guarantees of outcomes.

Review Milestones:

  • Initial review after three months from the effective date of the amendment
  • Periodic reviews at least quarterly thereafter
  • Reviews assess scope alignment, collaboration effectiveness, and whether adjustments are needed

Relationship to Y3 Budget

The Y3 TEL Allocation approved $130,000 for the STORM Partnership within the TAO’s operational budget. The revised annual cost of CHF 120,000 (approximately $135,000 USD at current exchange rates) remains within the approved budgetary envelope (75,000 CHF to year end). No additional TEL allocation is required for the STORM amendment.


Rationale

Strategic Alignment with Association Mission

The Telcoin Association’s mission is to connect GSMA MNOs and a global user base through the Telcoin Platform. The Association’s vision explicitly targets a globally adopted ecosystem aligning MNOs and mobile phone users around common blockchain infrastructure. With validator onboarding underway and mainnet launch approaching, the Association is positioned to pursue the next phase of MNO engagement - activating operators as application developers, establishing Telcoin Network’s role within GSMA standardization efforts, and building the telecom use cases that drive sustained network activity. The advisory engagement funds the specific capability required to drive that next phase. The STORM amendment ensures the Association’s operational partner is aligned to support it.

Proportional Equivalence Between Costs and Benefits

The advisory engagement costs $10,000 per month - less than a single mid-level engineering hire. The potential return, measured in MNO application development, GSMA standard positioning, and telecom use case activation, is asymmetric. Each MNO that builds applications on Telcoin Network and drives transaction volume through its subscriber base generates compounding value for every participant in the ecosystem. The milestone-based bonus structure aligns compensation with outcomes that directly benefit the Association.

The STORM amendment reduces annual cost by CHF 40,000 while focusing scope on the services the Association needs most at this stage: community stability and BD pipeline support. The addition of program coordination for the advisory engagement consolidates vendor management and reduces administrative overhead.

Feasibility

Technical: The advisory scope requires no new infrastructure. It leverages existing Telcoin Network capabilities and GSMA engagement channels.

Economic: The combined cost of both engagements (advisory at $170K annual maximum + STORM at approximately $135K annual) totals approximately $305K -

modest relative to the Y3 TAO budget ($1.8M) and the scale of value at stake in MNO ecosystem development.

Financial: TEL transfers are structured on a quarterly basis rather than a single upfront allocation. The initial transfer of 50,000,000 TEL at current reference rates ($0.0015/TEL) provides $75,000, sufficient to cover Q1 advisory fees plus both milestone bonuses if triggered within the first quarter. Subsequent quarterly transfers will be authorized by the TAO prior to the end of each quarter, contingent on the engagement continuing, with any unused TEL returned to the Treasury upon termination. Total maximum deployment across the 24-month term remains 194,000,000 TEL. The STORM amendment requires no new TEL allocation — it operates within the existing Y3 TAO budget.

Political: Council members have been briefed on the advisor’s identity and credentials. The phased public disclosure is consistent with precedent established in prior confidential engagements such as exchange listings.

Sustainability

The initial 50,000,000 TEL transfer represents 0.7% of the remaining 7.2B TEL Treasury inventory (pre-Y3 emissions). Total maximum deployment across the full 24-month term of 194,000,000 TEL represents 2.7% of current Treasury inventory. This is a targeted deployment with defined duration and clear exit provisions. Unused TEL returns to the Treasury upon early termination.


Implementation

Advisory Engagement

  1. Budget Approval: UUpon approval of this TELIP, 50,000,000 TEL will be transferred from the TEL Treasury to the TAO safe for the Strategic Telecom Advisory engagement. Subsequent quarterly transfers will be authorized by the TAO prior to the end of each quarter, with amounts calibrated to projected fees and milestone exposure for the coming quarter. Any unused TEL in the TAO safe at termination or engagement conclusion returns to the TEL Treasury.
  2. Contract Execution: The TAO will execute the independent contractor agreement with the advisor and coordinate onboarding through STORM Partners.
  3. Evaluation Period: Months 1-3 operate under the mutual evaluation provision. The TAO will report to Council members on early engagement progress before the continuation decision at month 3.
  4. Public Announcement: At month 4, the advisor’s identity and role will be publicly announced through Association communication channels. The TELIP documentation on telcoin.org will be updated to reflect the advisor’s name and profile.
  5. Ongoing Reporting: The TAO will include advisory engagement status in its standard bi-annual reporting to the Platform and Treasury Councils. Quarterly summaries from the advisor (coordinated by STORM Partners) will be made available to Council members.
  6. TEL Conversion: The TAO is authorized to convert TEL from the TAO safe to USD-pegged stablecoins as needed to fund monthly advisory fees and milestone payments, consistent with existing TAO treasury management practices.
  7. Early Termination: If the engagement terminates during the evaluation period or at any point thereafter, any remaining TEL in the TAO safe will be returned to the TEL Treasury. The TAO will report the termination and remaining balance to the Platform and Treasury Councils.
  8. Compliance Council Review: The Compliance Council may, at its discretion, review the advisor’s authorization under its operational contributor authorization authority per CCIP procedures.

STORM Partners Amendment

  1. Amendment Effective Date: The revised STORM scope and fee structure takes effect 1 April 2026 upon approval of this TELIP.
  2. Credit Application: The CHF 15,000 credit will be applied over April, May, and June 2026 invoices as specified in the fee structure above.
  3. Ongoing Accountability: STORM will operate under the accountability framework described in Part 2, with the first formal review at three months from the amendment effective date and quarterly reviews thereafter.
  4. Funding Source: The STORM amendment is funded from the existing Y3 TAO operational budget. No additional TEL allocation is required.

Transfers

Upon approval, the following TEL transfer will be made from the TEL Treasury:

Safe Transfer Amount Purpose
TAO Safe 50,000,000 TEL (initial); subsequent quarterly transfers authorized by TAO prior to each quarter Q1 advisory fees, milestone bonuses, and conversion costs; subsequent quarters funded prior to period start. Maximum 24-month deployment: 194,000,000 TEL (at $0.0015)

Note: The STORM Partners amendment requires no TEL transfer. It is funded from the existing Y3 TAO operational allocation.


Concluding Remarks

Telcoin Network was built with a specific industry in mind. Its validator architecture reserves participation rights for GSMA Operator Members. Its governance structure is organized around MNO engagement. Its economic model depends on operators validating the chain and building on it - both objectives are essential, and neither is subordinate to the other. The entire system is a thesis made infrastructure: that the world will unite on a blockchain coordinated by mobile operators - and that Telcoin Network was built to be it.

That recognition does not emerge from whitepapers or bilateral conversations alone. It emerges from within. Standards coalesce around trusted voices with standing inside the institutions that govern them. The GSMA is no different. The argument this TELIP makes is not that the Association lacks effort or capability - the commercial traction and operational foundation are real. The argument is that there is a structural ceiling on what engagement from outside the GSMA can achieve when the objective is industry-wide standardization, and that ceiling requires a specific kind of person to break through it.

This engagement funds that person: a mobile operator veteran, expert in both telecommunications and blockchain and their convergence, with the GSMA relationships and peer credibility to bring operators into alignment around a shared infrastructure standard - not as a vendor pitch, but as a trusted voice from within the industry itself.

The cost is defined. The accountability is structured. The evaluation period provides downside protection, and the milestone bonuses align the advisor’s compensation with the outcomes that matter most: GSMA institutional positioning and a first telecom design partnership. The STORM amendment ensures the operational infrastructure supporting both engagements is appropriately focused and financially rationalized.

The councils have been briefed on the advisor’s identity and credentials. The community will learn at month four, after an initial period in which the advisor establishes an independent content track record and both parties confirm mutual fit. This sequencing is consistent with how the Association has handled prior confidential engagements, and the rationale is straightforward: demonstrate value before announcing it.

Telcoin Network’s architecture was designed for this industry. This engagement is the investment required to ensure the industry recognizes it.

TEL The World,

Parker Spann

Executive Director, TAO

Founder and Platform Council Member, Telcoin Association

EVP at Telcoin

2 Likes

Is there anyway to change the distribution of USD denominated payments to be more balanced and less front-loaded?

I’m specifically thinking about the timing of the two milestones, assuming they can both be accomplished in year 1.

What incentive does this Advisor have to continue being active in their role if all of year 2’s payments happen monthly regardless of any additional progress.

In summary, can year 2’s payments be redistributed into smaller monthly payments and the difference be used for additional milestones to take place in year 2?

Maybe 50% of the currently monthly year 2 payments can be paid monthly and the other 50% can be used for two (2) year two milestones (both parties can agree to what those are)? The same amount of money over the engagement is still allocated but it at least adds incentive to keep supporting the TAO’s GSMA presence into year 2?

1 Like

IMO this shouldn’t be a TelcoinTAO decision, but rather Telcoin Holding and i imagine throughout the years some of the sitting staff got enough experience already to fulfill the above.

It’s promoting and exposing the telcoin network to GSMA and mno’s. 100% falls on the Telcoin Association. Remember at this point , holdings is a developer on the Telcoin network.

1 Like

Is there anything to showcase STORM’s performance metrics thus far? I don’t believe they’re much of a crowd favorite currently and sentiment is as down as it’s ever been. What are their major accomplishments or milestone achievements? They release a massive ‘State of Blockchain 2025’ and didn’t mention Telcoin once? Being critical but also, it’s alarming sometimes how small of crowd it is that’s aware of Telcoin.

For the strategic advisor role…it needs to be announced and promoted from day 1, not month 4. I wholeheartedly get the ‘contract to hire’ approach but with the responsibility they’re tasked with and the talking up of this individual’s background, what purpose is served by keeping them a secret other than there not being internal confidence in them or the stage of development everything is in? We are more than past due for execution…keeping someone a secret while asking for a significant amount of funding doesn’t instill continued confidence. It’s time to finally deliver, promote, acknowledge and create excitement…not secrecy.

If the councils and the TAO didn’t have full confidence in this person why would you think we would go forward with it?

Just some continued thinking. There is no way in good faith anyone can vote yes to funding this strategic advisor, keeping them a secret hire and not disclosing who they are on day 1. This is written up as they’re the most important person in the chain of command working with MNO’s and the idea is to keep them hidden is wrong. This needs to be showcased and celebrated and promoted…not hidden. The first mover advantage is slipping away, execution needs to happen with all hands on deck.

I get not understanding because your not in place with all the info but you have to understand this council would never vote on something trying to hide things from people. This is a huge get for us and will benefit us greatly. Remember this contract isn’t just our requirements, they have some too

Fair and valid…but the biggest handicap the team struggles with is celebrating achievements and strategic moves. A couple of retweets and X posts aren’t getting it done. This goes back to my earlier question on STORM…what impact have they made and why would we not use their market prowess to boost market sentiment with this hire? Yes, talking about it on a council call helps and is technically transparent, but for this person to be as important as they’re intended to be…this should be touted and promoted. Building in silence was always Paul’s MO and it made sense in the beginning, but not anymore…the silence feels more like missed execution. I know I’m critical…but sometimes critical takes can spark constructive conversation.

This might make sense in principle, but right now it’s asking for approval of a large treasury allocation without enough transparency or accountability.

Asking for sign off on ~200M TEL for an advisor we’re not even allowed to know the identity of until months later isn’t ideal. That removes any real ability to evaluate whether this is a good use of funds before it’s committed.

The “metrics” also don’t inspire confidence. It’s mostly meetings, introductions, and general engagement, not actual outcomes. It feels like funding initial interaction with MNO’s, rather than demonstrating results that arguably should already be apparent.

What really makes this feel off is the timing. The narrative for years has been telecom adoption and MNO onboarding at scale, yet we’re only now hiring an advisor to help get access to that ecosystem. That sounds less like scaling progress and more like still trying to unlock it, which is a mismatch with what has been communicated in recent months.

Not against the idea, but to me, this proposal lacks the transparency and needs clearer outcome-based expectations before asking for this level of allocation. Meetings and introductions are not outcomes, and tbh, i thought we were meant to be well in to that phase, not just starting it.

1 Like

I think there may be some confusion based on how the proposal reads.

The position already has an identified person with the qualifications listed out in the first paragraph. No one on telcoin holdings or in the association has those qualifications.

Perfectly written and said. This seems like this should have all been done already. It also feels like trying to recover from missed opportunities and missed deadlines.

I’ll have to take your word for it that it’s a ‘huge get’, as I have no ability to verify this myself, nor will any community member.

But uh…. Perhaps in me stating that, you see the glaring issue with some of what you’ve said.

This is what people on these councils are here to do. Make the best decisions for this whole ecosystem. Elected people to represent everyone. If you or anyone else feels the councils aren’t doing that then join, there’s open seats. This isn’t a cop out. I mean it. Join, get nda’d and you can get involved and hear and see what’s going on.

Just to be clear, after 3 month intro period, this will be publicly announced

Let me know if there is another place I should put my question or if this is the right forum? I would like to have a discussion solely to ensure budgeted funds are used as productive as possible. Thanks all and I appreciate the hard work.

Thanks for putting this together Parker. The strategic logic is strong and I think the framing around GSMA standardization is the right one. The proposal correctly identifies that bilateral BD conversations can only take the Association so far. What actually moves an industry toward a shared infrastructure standard is trusted voices from inside the operator community doing the convincing, and that is not something you can hire externally and then pitch your way into. The commitment the advisor has made to deploy their own blockchain products on Telcoin Network also goes beyond typical advisory scope and signals genuine alignment with the platform. That part of the argument holds up.

A few things I’d like to see addressed before this goes to a vote.

Advisor Identity and Community Confidence

The confidential identity is the most significant issue for the broader community. Council members have been briefed, which handles governance accountability internally, but the community at large is being asked to support a 194M TEL allocation for someone they have no way to independently evaluate. The month-four reveal is a reasonable approach, but it does put the community in the position of backing a significant allocation on trust alone while the councils carry the full weight of due diligence on their behalf. The profile provided in the TELIP (25+ years in telecom, senior leadership within a major global operator’s blockchain and Web3 initiatives, active GSMA participant, regular MWC speaker) is helpful but still general enough that it could describe a number of individuals. Even a small amount of additional signal would help here without compromising the confidentiality rationale. Something like the advisor’s current sector focus, their employer category (Tier 1 MNO, regional operator, etc.), or whether they currently hold a named role in any existing GSMA working group. None of that would identify them, but it would give the community something more concrete to evaluate alongside the profile language already in the TELIP.

GSMA Working Group Milestone

This needs to be tightened before the vote. The GSMA’s own documentation makes clear that working group participation is open to all GSMA members through the Member Gateway. Telcoin has been a GSMA Associate Member since February 2018, the first blockchain company to achieve that status. The question is what the milestone in this TELIP is actually measuring beyond the access Telcoin already has.

The milestone language reads: “$25,000 USD upon establishment of a GSMA Working Group with a formally defined Telcoin role, or formal Telcoin participation in an existing GSMA Working Group.” The first trigger, establishing a new working group with a defined Telcoin role, is a clear, high-value outcome. The second trigger, “formal Telcoin participation in an existing GSMA Working Group,” is where the ambiguity sits. The word “formal” is doing significant work in that sentence, but the TELIP does not define what distinguishes formal participation from the baseline working group access any GSMA member already has through the Member Gateway.

It would be worth clarifying what specifically triggers this milestone. Named contributor status within a working group, a submitted contribution document on record, Telcoin Network referenced in a published working group output, or something else entirely? These represent materially different levels of institutional engagement. The proposal’s own accountability framework actually hints at the right answer. The Access and Room Quality metrics reference a “GSMA Working Group status progression (Observer, Contributor, Defined Role),” but the milestone trigger itself does not specify which of those thresholds applies. Aligning the milestone language with the progression framework already described in the accountability section would resolve this.

To be clear, Milestone Bonus 2 (execution of a Telecom Design Partner LOI or pilot agreement) does not have this problem. That is a concrete, verifiable event. This feedback is specific to Milestone 1.

Reporting Structure and STORM’s Role

One structural note on reporting. The proposal states that STORM Partners coordinates the advisor’s quarterly reporting, translating advisory inputs into council-ready formats before Council submission. The advisor reviews and confirms each summary, which provides a check, but the drafting and framing still sits with STORM.

STORM is a paid vendor whose own engagement is being restructured and partially justified through this same TELIP. Having them prepare and coordinate the performance reporting of the advisory engagement creates an indirect accountability layer that, even if unintentional, represents a structural conflict of interest. The TAO should own the drafting and submission of advisory performance reporting directly, with STORM providing administrative coordination support rather than serving as the intermediary between the advisor’s output and what Council sees.

None of this is an objection to the proposal in principle. The cost is proportional at $170,000 maximum annually against a $1.8M TAO budget and the scale of value at stake in MNO ecosystem development. The milestone structure is more rigorous than most advisory arrangements at this stage, particularly with the advisor’s commitment to deploy their own products on the network. The 3-month mutual evaluation period with 15 days’ written notice provides real downside protection, and unused TEL returns to the Treasury in the event of early termination.

The engagement makes strategic sense given where Telcoin Network is right now. These are just the questions that I feel as if they need clearer answers before the councils vote on a 24-month commitment with confidence.

1 Like

@Thadcollins17 the TAO will respond as much as possible to these inquiries and it’ll be discussed in public at the next P&T meeting on thursday. both forums of communication are equally important and we’ll ensure everyone’s questions get answered.

We just need execution and launch…no more analysis paralysis and delays.

Thad, this is a fair and well-reasoned structural point. You are right that once both milestones are achieved, Year 2 compensation reverts to a flat monthly retainer with no additional performance incentives built in.

The engagement includes reviews every quarter, which means there are multiple structured moments to assess whether Year 2 milestone structures should be introduced by amendment. This is a conversation the Council is open to having at the quarter one review if the engagement is tracking well. We will address this at the Council meeting today and follow up here.