Apologies; missed tagging you in a re: to the above.
We’ll look at improving how these type of things are reported moving forward.
All I can really ask for at this stage.
So basically you are effectively admitting the telco thesis isn’t where the marketing has implied it is.
Now you’re asking token holders to trust the leadership that an undisclosed person, selected behind closed doors, is worth up to $290k, while another paid contractor is involved in managing the engagement.
At worst you’re just draining investors money into your own networks pockets and at best this is institutional groupthink where you’ve convinced yourselves that activity is progress.
it’s not even a full time job role just loose set of deliverable that aren’t correctly measured.
- 3–5 “meaningful” meetings — what objectively makes a meeting meaningful?
- 2–3 “high-quality” introductions — an introduction isn’t the same as a commercial opportunity.
- “Credible adoption pathway” — who decides what is credible or whether it’s actually progressing?
- “Advisory input influenced the roadmap” — this is almost impossible to independently verify.
- Developer engagement / advisor products launched — these measure activity, not whether an MNO is actually adopting Telcoin.
- Meanwhile, the $10k/month is largely guaranteed, regardless of whether any MNO actually commits to a pilot or deployment.
If they were that good just offer a finders fee for a fully signed on MNO?
The real KPIs should be things like signed MNO pilots, technical integrations, deployments and ultimately measurable network usage. Otherwise we’re essentially paying for meetings and introductions and trusting the TAO to judge whether they’re valuable.
Thanks…
2 Likes
How about now? Is David Palmer the selected individual?
Well said and I agree. 
I’d review the KPI’s again. Most of what you’re asking for is defined and all KPI’s are being met.
2 Likes