I’m confused. What he is describing here is about influencers, not the poster of the proposal. I think there’s confusion. The comments were directed at the perceived ineffectiveness of influencers in crypto.
For what it’s worth, I don’t agree with that sentiment, but that’s the point of healthy discussion.
Can I ask what your resolution to the perceived slight is? Is it a personal issue? Are you concerned your proposal won’t be brought to the table?
Thank you. I feel like this is turning a mole hill into a mountain. I disagree with the fundamentals of the proposal. You’ve spent most of your time here trying to incriminate me on a mere disagreement as opposed to speaking to the fundamentals. Not every idea is going to be met with a bouquet of flowers. That’s what this platform was created for. Let’s talk about the substance of our ideas and see what is supported from the community to try and grow the ecosystem.. We can’t get so offended when someone disagrees with them. It will only harbor fewer ideas being brought forward. Again, I apologize if you were offended with my opposing view, but I’m not going to be silenced from your threats of legal action because of it. I’m happy to speak on the substance of the proposals whenever you are.
And I did just that, didn’t I? I responded with an entire counter proposal with a clear explanation for it and have been going back and forth since, being as professional as possible addressing my stance on it..
If we are keeping score, there’s more responding to this thread that support the initial proposal and not the amended, so I don’t believe the discussion in telegram mattered at all to sway any purpose of a proposal consideration.
Outside looking in, this may be more of an issue with the circumstances of being banned from telegram, possibly?
Let’s please keep things on marketing the project and remove the emotion
Man, I wish my proposal got even more than 1 like. Consider yourself lucky!
This proposal wasn’t personal. The response in the telegram group was personal lucky enough I still have the screen shots from when @L1bertyLad banned me from the telegram group for asking a question he deemed had already been asked along with his response and having a good laugh about it after.
Now on this same telegram group he referred to my proposal as comparing Telcoin to a meme.
This isn’t something new it’s happenied before I’ve avoided any conflict over all of it, I didn’t mention it on X or in discord I just moved on as it wasn’t anything official but it’s crossing the line now.
This is my exact argument over Council members over stepping the line and hiding behind “personal opinion”
Yeah really lucky 
. I will remove the proposal more hassle than it’s worth
I read this as some very direct comments on the idea of social media influencers and memecoins, not on the OP himself. Agreed. I think there may be confusion that you were referring to him, which you werent and that wasn’t how i read it - the critizism was of the mechanism of social media influence. Efd
It seems there’s some past history that may need resolving, I don’t think these forums are the place to do so.
I’d suggest @Midlander that you ask for this thread to be deleted since it’s so far off topic, and you repost your proposal so it can be properly vetted. There’s some great data and points in there that I find very valid.
Let’s stay focused on the proposals. 
This thread has been locked because discussion had deviated from productive discourse about the influencer marketing proposal.
